Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gianmarco Ferrari vs Jay Clarke Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ferrari vs Clarke analysis and find out who is favored!
Gianmarco Ferrari vs Jay Clarke Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ferrari has won 45.2% of points on his second serve, while Clarke has won 52.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ferrari, in recent form, has won 50.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Clarke has won 54.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.03% and 40.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ferrari has saved 59.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Clarke has saved 58.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ferrari has won 47.54% of matches played (W/L 29/ 32), with Clarke winning 73.91% (W/L 51/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ferrari has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 110/ 90), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 10/ 16). Clarke has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 129/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 26% (W/L 10/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Ferrari has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.74% of matches (W/L 17/ 21), where as Clarke has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.6% of matches (W/L 47/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ferrari has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.05 while Clarke has played against players with an average rank of 197.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ferrari has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Clarke has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ferrari has converted 44.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Clarke has converted 47.99% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ferrari 0 - 0 Clarke
595
Rank
387
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
349
Rank
153
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
52% (131-121)
Career Total W/L
57% (270-202)
45% (10-12)
YTD W/L
71% (27-11)
$3,280
Career Prize Money
$116,120
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gianmarco Ferrari | Jay Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (10/12) | 71% (27/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (25/30) | 66% (59/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (260/272) | 55% (471/378) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 75% (24/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 69 | 81 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:6 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 261.5 | 227.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1130/1790) | 59% (1603/2710) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (736/1130) | 65% (1049/1603) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (300/660) | 51% (569/1107) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (78/173) | 47% (165/350) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (679/1711) | 45% (1274/2805) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Futures W/L | 45% (9/11) | 71% (24/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (10/22) | 72% (26/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 69% (9/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (6/11) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 92% (24/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 8% (24/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (16/6) | 36% (14/5) |
Gianmarco Ferrari Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Raphael Calzi
44%
(
28 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Otegui
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
71%
(
72 of
102)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
82%
(
69 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
111)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
13%
(
2 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Valerio Perruzza
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
67%
(
74 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
111)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
54%
(
59 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
109
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Stefano Reitano
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Jay Clarke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Jay Clarke
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
97%
(
35 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
8 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
50%
(
55 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
74 of
113)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
51%
(
56 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
109
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Omni Kumar
38%
(
12 of
32)
1st Serve %
76%
(
22 of
29)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Juan Bautista Otegui
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Lorenzo Ferri
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Jay Clarke
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Jay Clarke
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
41%
(
27 of
66)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Jay Clarke
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Max Alcala Gurri
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ferrari Vs Clarke Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
